Comments on: antique chewing gum package by wriggly. – $10

By: Edwin

Edwin — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:53:13 +0000

Is it the plen-t pack of 17 pieces, or is it the downsized 15 piece pack?

By: Cougar Allen

Cougar Allen — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:42:26 +0000

I will make you an “offer” to pay you in “money.”

-Cougar :{)

By: Joe Mama

Joe Mama — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:45:26 +0000

What if I find a pack of gum from 1993? Ahh, the nostalgia… And it would be worth far more than a pack from 1996…

By: Alex

Alex — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:42:04 +0000

Since when is something from 1996 an antique? I’m only 24, but sheesh, that makes me feel old.

By: Chipo

Chipo — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:19:20 +0000

Maggie : Your pictures are funny but way, way too much lame commentary. Take a lesson from http://cakewrecks.

What a pathtic way to push an url.

By: Brian Schlosser

Brian Schlosser — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:33:55 +0000

I dunno… some weird losers (such as myself) collect vintage packaging. When Wrigley’s changed the 70 years old or so designs on their gums, I felt a little tug of nostalgia. I have actually looked to buy some of the old wrappers… SO… I call legit. Strange, niche hobby for sure, but not totally unbelievable.

By: SgtArky

SgtArky — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:14:53 +0000

how about some ABC gum

By: Mr. Bojangles

Mr. Bojangles — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:53:25 +0000

The saddest part is that the poster has the packages that say Wrigley but still managed to spell it wrong.

By: Loudo

Loudo — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:31:59 +0000

Misty, I mildly disagree with you, but mainly because of this:

http://www.unnecessaryquotes.com/

By: Misty

Misty — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:58:37 +0000

I’m positive this is a joke. The content is almost believable, but the random quotes have me convinced that it’s not serious.